|
Bobby's World
| |  | | | Advocate Mom /Representative | | | | | | | | | | | | Personal Thoughts | RESOURCES FOUND DURING RESEARCHING
FOR | Robert
Cook | (BOBBY'S) CASES | Questions | To Ask And Think about | | | FOR
PARTICIPANTS IN | | | AHCA
& APD Services | Laws & Cases | Cases Won by Participant | Resources to Law found while Researching. | Centers
for Medicaid/Medicare Services CMS | POWERFUL WEB RESOURCES | eHow | Lawers.com | Bad Practices | "APD & AHCA " | Continue to do | EVEN AFTER COURT REVEALED PRACTICES
ARE UNFAIR TO THE PARTICIPANT | "APD"
Cases Lost Read More | | "APD"
Misinterprested the State Law. Read More | "NO, Fair Hearing's" Especially, If the Participant has "NO
ATTORNEY" | | | | Desk Reviews "Non- licensed Administration
Employees Making Medical Decisions or ignoring, medical condition all together placing the Participant in harms way. |  | Just started archives | Archives | | | 12/20/2012 | | | | | | | | Please forgive the multiple copies many drafts are kept due to my continuous learning
in writing. I am not a professional writer, I am an advocate being a voice the voiceless even if it means embarrassing errors.
I am doing the best, I know how. |
| |
|
| | |
| | | PLease
Forgive the Way the web site looks my point is to get the information to the public. Looks is not as important as information
in my book. I hope follow along well. | | | | | |
OPEN Government Revealed | documents
Below |  |  |
| | | | | | |
 | Our Son's Medical Conditions and History - Experiences with
Power Wheel Chairs |  | Twenty plus near death experiences - A Make a Wish Child survived
past 18 | How? Prayer | 
| ATTENTION
!! ATTENTION!! ATTENTION!!! UPDATE May 3-8 2013 | | Governor Scott, the following documents will be being
presented to you in the next few days. I will attempted to explain, as I would have, if I were in your office since
you have not been available. Mr. Doyal presented 9 series of documents providing APD point of view, in his
investigation . Now it's the Participants, representative's, turn to share what we know responding to
his 9 series. However as I said you were only given partial information. We will back our reasons for our claims
with facts and documents signed by APD administrations or bar codes from Agency in colaboration with APD reflecting
our claims from documents which were mailed or received by Open Government. I apologize for the wait but we were hoping APD
would be more Opened with their portion of Government. The report we'll be using will be audio, visual when
ever possible. I attempted to better my writing but there were series of issues distractions, together with medical
issues in our family, which cause major delays not only in our personal lives but my personal educational one as-well.
| 
| | Responding to Series |  | The information will be revealed in
sections one at a time, due to the amount of information being revealed . We Will be posting the
information through out the following week together with my research. (Thank
You for Your Patients) | | "All the
information is being added as time permits". Information and evidence presented is taken from Agencies formed
and or signed. " evidence" | | | | Did you know that
APD created 50,000 plus Sole Proprietor buisness for competant and non-competent disabled people calling them Employers? The Definition of Sole Proprietor. Think about that. HOw is a non-compitent person an employer do you really think they have a choice? Just a thought
to ponder on. | (1) 1999 | | (2) 1999 | |
(3) 2000 | | (4)
2001 | | (5) 2003 | | (6) 2003 | | (7)
2004 | | (8) 2005 | | (9) 2006 | | (10)
2007 | | (11) 2008 | | (12) 2009 | | (13)
2010 | | (14) 2011 | | (15) 2012 | | (16)
2013 |  | |  | |  | | | | | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | | | | | | | | | | Participant #D130098 | | Participant # 3937 | | GovConnect Contract | | GovConnect
Contract | | GovConnect Contract | | SAME
AS First Data Goverment Solution Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MED-WAIVER | | MED-WAIVER | | MED-WAIVER | | MED-WAIVER / CDC + Pilot Program | | | | Dept. of Management Services | | Dept. of Management Services | | Dept. of Management Services | | Dept. of Management Services | | Dept. of Management Services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Out of State Banks | | Out
of State Banks | | Out of State Banks | | Out of State Banks | | changed their name to: | | Subbed to | | Out of State Banks | | Does not show what bank is being used. | | Does
not show what bank is being used. | | Does not show what bank is being used. | | Does
not show what bank is being used. | | Does not show what bank is being used. | | | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | | | |  | |  | |  | | | | | |  | | | |  | | | |  | | Elders affairs gave vouchers not checks nor did we see what bank was used. | | Elders
affairs gave vouchers not checks nor did we see what bank was used. | | Elders affairs
gave vouchers not checks nor did we see what bank was used. | | | |  | | | |  | |  | |  | |  | | What I find odd is; WHY are we not rieceving Main's L fiscal agent Check like all the other
Fiscal agent, If Mains'L is truly our Fiscal Agent? | | CDC plus took over to resolve the sub
contracting issue, yet APD is doing the same. | | IN the 6 years being with CDC + we have not recieved
a check with the Mains'L Logo. It's all been CDC+ | |  | | MED-WAIVER | | MED-WAIVER | | MED-WAIVER | | MED-WAIVER
/ CDC+ | | CDC+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Evidence Signed Document | | DS/HCBS WAIVER | | For
A minor | H CBS Service Waiver | | ICF/DD | | FSTS COMPLETED on | | 5/26/99
by RB-N | 8/12/99 | | | | Medicaid
# Entered | | xxxxx95105 | | T.C.
| | R130034 | | CODE DEPT. | REX D130098 |
|
|
| |
| | Evidence Signed Document | Medicaid
Waiver | | Divion in the | | In the Adult Care Divison A.P.
| | being the Director |
| | 10/25/99 | Supervisor | G.M. Miami | | RE-Entered Medicaid | | #xxxxx2528-0 | | signed
of by T.B | | Medicaid waiver Diviion in the | | In the Adult Care Divison A.P. being the Director | | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | | EMP ID / Dept | T.C.
1/30/03 - 5/15/03 | | R130034 | | CODE
DEPT. | | REX D130098 | | EMP ID / Dept | T.C. 6/30/03
- FORWARD | | R130034 / 0033099 |
| EMP ID / Dept | T.C. 6/30/03 - FORWARD | | R130034
/ 0033099 |
|
| | | |
| |
| | FDGS
sent vendor checks as employees and | | Note: | | Representative cannot
be employeed according to APD however FDGS sent checks entering Representatives as employees
and single on the reimbersement records on checks | | The information was wrong. The
single person was married | | It was reported we were ignored |
Fdgs REP. employee ID 902180 | | | |
| | SAME AS First Data
Goverment Solution Inc. | | Subbed to | | PPL JAN-FEBTO APD-FEB FORWARD | | |
| |
| APD AGENCY | | APD - BUISNESS
| | APD "Buisness "then subbed to Main's L |
| |
| APD AGENCY | | APD - BUISNESS | | APD
"Buisness "then subbed to Main's L |
| | | APD AGENCY | | APD - BUISNESS | | APD
"Buisness "then subbed to Main's L |
| | | APD AGENCY | | APD - BUISNESS | | APD
"Buisness "then subbed to Main's L |
| | | APD AGENCY | | APD - BUISNESS | | APD
"Buisness "then subbed to Main's L |
| | | | | | | | | | Agency
Employees Involved or Notified | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | notes
from 98 | | 10/25/99 | | | | SR-/ L.L. | | L.L. | | LL
/M.A.W. | | M.A.W. | | M.A.W. | | M.A.W. | | M.A.W./JP | | J.P. | | J.P. | | J.P. | | J.P. | | J.P./
A.B. | | |
| | Note; I am adding all ID # given to my
son to show how many times the numbers changed through out the years to explain why I came to such conclusion of fraud
together with the evidence. |  | Waiver Support Coordinators
we chose - (1) S.R (C.O) 1998, (2) 2001-L.L. (3) M.W. 2003- , (4) 2007-J.P., (5) 2012-A.B. - ( not affiliated
with the 2003-2007) A.B, )
Waiver Support Coordinators (WSC)* Management plus many other Title -all the same with differnt titles
( At least in our experience ). | | | 1999 1999 2000 2001 | | 2001 2002 2003 | | 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 | | 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
2012 | | 2012 2013 | | | | | | C.S
RECIEVES THE PACKET 10/9/2003 | | | | | | | | | | and
sends it to TWO | | | | | | | | | | un-known people to us on 11/14/03 under my birth name Elda Lee & my
husbands nick name , Ted Cook . DCF Division of Adult Care & Family Support
gets confirmation attention to D.C in Miami (my son was not an adult At the time) | | | | | | | | | | C.S enters wrong address 8 DAYS After we informed them of our 1ST AND 2ND choices (M.A.W, C.W) | | | | | | | | | | 1/1/07
PP | | 8/1/08 PP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fraud accounts found | | Fraud accounts found | | Fraud accounts found | | Fraud accounts found | | Fraud accounts found | | Agency Forms Used/ dates & times | | Agency Forms
Used/ dates & times | | Agency Forms Used/ dates & times | | Agency
Forms Used/ dates & times | | Agency Forms Used/ dates & times |  | | | |
| |  | | | | | | | | WHY? (SUPPORT COORDINATOR) M.A.W 11/6/03
PACKET TRANSFER 10/10/03 | | | | | | Consumer Opportunity
Inc. S.R (S.R Assigned several WSC ) Choices were made for the Participant). After going to a
meeting understanding we had a choice We released S.R. Immidiatly | | L.L
| | M.A.W. appointed A.B#1 (different person from
2012 -2013 A.B #2 )Under M.W. watch A.B was entered without participants knowledge or consent | | JP
(being paid under Buisness name and Provider Individual name ) Why? | | A.B | | | | | | | | | | | Support
Coordinators Assigned (1)S.R ,(2)T.C,(3) E.A,(4) | | | | Paid
under multiple title change | | We chose J.P. on 11/1/07 | | Started
Nov 2012-Ended March 2013 | | E.A - equested adult dental 6/14/01 my son was a minor under
R.C. | | MORE COMING | | Consultant
Services -CDCD DS per day 148.39 12/31/06 | | J.P Became a new WSC on 11/1/07 J.P signed
S.G on this case with the HMS company. Why? It was not done with the consent of the Participant. APD C.S Tranfer by
C.S released the packet to J.P. | | IN no Fault of (A.B.) Documents show Accounting
placed (A.B.) name to cover all of 2012 in the web sumarries, when she entered the picture in November 2012 | | Multiple
WSC chosen for the participants . Using multiple Social Security and medicaid numbers. Documents reveal signatures of Agency
Admiinistration approvals. | | | | Consultant
Services -CDCD DS per day $161.60 1/31/07 | | Again entered as a new consultant under R.C. 0033099
as a New Consultant Why? | | Why did APD allow accounting to enter her the whole year of 2012 if she
was not even in the picture until November of 2012. | | | | | | | | ABC
name Change 10/1/08 CDC+ MOA executed signatures J.P. & M.M. | | | | APD
Response when first informed | | | | | | MORE COMING | | | | Listened butno action takeneven
after showing them documents. | | | | | | | | | The
waiver Support Coordinators used different series of Medicaid numbers and Social Security Numbers under our son's name. They
were reported and no one was ever reprimanded, nor were any follow ups with reported to the participants, after
reporting them. Waiver administration signed documents were simply avoided and excpected to fade away. |
What WSC, CM, dont reveal to the Participants. They have multiple Provider numbers under one Participants. They use multiple
titles under one participant without their knowledgeor consent. When reporting information to the state, It seems
that funding is going to different directions when in-fact they are paying the same person under different
name/ title . In my son case I will tell you they did very little to deserve the funding recieved. "In my opinion
the Waiver Support Coordinators in my Son's case took advantage in many cases and did not reveal all the transactiions
behind the scenes leaving the "participants and the their Representative in the Dark " . What the
Waiver Support Coordinator I usually did it on my own. IN MY CASE they had to do very little. I knew how to find resources
and had the abilitity to do everything they did minus the DATA input in the Administrations Systems. IN
reference to title change , PLEASE NOTE WSC, Case Management, and all the titles , used under our son's name
did nothing different, and in some cases we only talked to them on the phone or one email . |
 | | April 21, 2013 | We have been waiting for "All" reports to come from APD, However, "All"
information requested from APD has not been provided as yet. We will be informing you; what was requested, what
was withheld from Participants, by APD. Most important, we will explain the best way we can as to why we have chosen to bring
this to the public. We are patiently waiting to see if they will honor " All " Open Government requests.
If not, with, or without, we will be responding to all the series of reports, in the order they came in. One by one. | | We appologize for the time span having to wait for responses to the reports, however, We have been waiting
for "All" requests to be responded to by APD. |  | | APRIL 3, 2013 | APD side did respond and
investigation are rolling in HOWEVER, "All,
the information submitted by APD is being Question ". | | As you read on you will understand. Investigations are still Rolling on both sides. | | We will leave the questions
UP from the past. To
help understand, what the OIG investigator(Mr. Doyal) is referring to when he states allegations. | On March 20, 2013 a series of reports were released, however "Not"
all the information was correct. Since the reports we have asked APD to provide the document used to come to their conclusions.
Open Government rights are being exersiced and expected to be granted to follow up as to How?, Who?, When?, and Where?
they got their information. | We
have requested, first request by email and now we are asking a 2nd time on the Website in public to APD, | | " (Mrs. Palmer) Please provided all the documents used, which supported Mr. Doyals conclusion. THis is our 2nd
request." |  | Our
Responses to OIG Report Series - COMING
SOON!! Audio and Visual docs will be presented (Samples of Whats To Come) |  | | APD - OIG Investigation
Mr. Doyal shares(FFMMIS finding distributions ) | | in 2007 $108,996.99, 2008 $89,139.05 , 2009 $68,636.58, 2010 $87,351.90, 2011 $67,074.73 2012 $52,172.40 | | While APD - Denise Arnold Deputy Director for Programs, shares with Governor
Rick Scott,that in Deposite | | 2007 (more to Come) 2008 $64,.807.96, 2009 $58,078.56
2010 $60,257.08 , 2011 $61,760.68, 2012 Report was printed out in 4/11/12 $19,390.32. | Hearing Discovery Documents show bigger numbers.
Cost Plans show bigger numbers "Where did the rest of the money go?" | | This is just the begining, much more was violated such as: | IRS documents tampered by APD appointed employees. Someone placed
an X for my son's behalf without our consent. Also Cost Plans were fraudulanty changed and entered into discovery in a hearing. | Maximus Approved dollars requested by APD on my son behalf and were
approved. They entered two documents twice in one they state he was competent in another he is incompetent, Why? when
Medicaid was covering it because he was a minor. So was he covered twice ? Documents proved several approvals different
units entered by different people especially in the 2007 - 2009 the numbers displayed above do not even touch the
numbers on the documents. | APD
will not display or say a word, However, We on the other hand have much to share. |  | | PLEASE NOTE:Credibility is
being challenged here, report tries to make the family look bad, but as you go through the reports. you will noticed, How
many mistakes APD allowed to occur throughout the years, if indeed they were mistakes or errors. | | Below are titles of reports submitted I am preparing the responses
to address every one. |  | | Thank You, Mr.
Doyal . We will be responding to all APD findings which were Not correct or partially correct . We will be breaking the information
down and responding to it in the order you presented it, in more detail. We will also be sharing the evidence with the intrested
parties. |
(The Problem) (Recommendation to FIX the Problems) LINKS have not
yet been activated . The links will be activated Very Soon. |  | | 1st Series -March 20, 2013 - False Account Numbers Report and Memo
- READ MORE 1 Research
| | 2st Series -March 21,
2013 Report on Magellan Health with Cover - READ MORE
Who authorized them ? soon to come 2 Research
| 3st Series -March 29, 2013 Cover Memo &
Report on Supported Housing - READ MORE 3
Research | 4st Series -March 29, 2013 Cover
Memo & Report of Theft by Providers - READ MORE 4
Research | | 5st Series -March 29, 2013 Cover Memo & Report of Employees Lying in Hearings
- READ MORE 5 Research | 6st Series -April 4th , 2013 Cover Memo
& Report Wheelchair - READ MORE (Mr. Doyal, Thank You for bring this up. This is
a Vital issue. ) 6 Research | 7th Series -April 4th , 2013
Cover Memo & Report on Alday- Read More 7
Research | 8th Series
-April 4th , 2013 Cover Memo & Report - Hopes Place-Read More 8
Research | | 9th Series -April 15th , 2013 Cover Memo & Report - - Improper
Claim of Employment Read More 9
Research | (Answers will be coming even for series 9 in the END) We will not be holding back. |  | Looking
at this program from the Participants side, what right do,we really have? | | Does the participant have a right to choose or is the choice made for them. What is this program
really about and how does it function. | | I
am not an attorney. I am a Mom who is not only concerned about our son who is a participant of the waiver I am also concerned
about the direction . APD has taken. In front of Governors, Senators and High officials every thing is great and perfect.
However that is not what all participants are feeling. | | We will address what we have come to learn and experience with APD leaders, administrations and Before
APD was even founded. | | First
lets talk about how this program came to be. (Coming Soon) Facts |  | Agency for Persons with Disabilities"APD" | Chooses "NOT"to Change
Practices Even After They Loose Cases. Why? | | For Example: They lost Newsome v. Agency For Persons With Disabilities or even Representative or Participants are forced to split an employees pay rate under 24 hour daily
which is 66$ less a day taking away from the 2 or 3 employee. The other two employees only work part time and are not
available all day nor are they live in employees. This move by "APD"eliminates an employee all together or takes
away time from other employees pay. It changes the Amount paid, Frequency of Personal Assistant Care. Is that even
legal with labor laws for "APD" to do such practices ? Even after Judges have in formed "APD" attorneys
it was unfair . Why do I say "APD" is abusing the system or should I say abusing "APD"
authority, Because they know the problem and continue to do what is wrong. They have continued these practices landing
participants in hearing.This causes participants more stress and heartache on top of their regular life challenges already
in place not by their own doing. So, Why has "APD"not fixed the problems. And, Where did all the funding go that
was taken from the participants forcing them to change purchase plans ? When "APD" knows they were declared making
mistakes such as, misinterpreting state Law in the Tier cases, Why are they not held accountable?. Why don't they fix
their document by removing the participants name and telling the state where the extra dollars they "Took" from
the participant go? Why are the funds still declared on documents under the participants name who never received them?
Was not dragging the participants through hearings, enough? By claiming funding under participants who were
never given the benefits to use the funding declared under their names. The "APD" Agency still claimed the
funding under the participants budgets. In my opinion "APD " has taken a stand and advantage to win cases
instead of serving the participants by using their pain for "APD" gain. IN my eyes I see people who gained
jobs on the backs of participants who did not ask to be disabled , it was not a choice yet they are once
again paying a price to the greed of man. To fix a budget is one thing but to steal under a disabled participant, well they
have no heart. | | | | To help means people have to change what is not working and try to find a solution . Why does "APD"
Not see they are hurting people not and causing more damage to
the situation already at hand . | | 
| Community
Questions for the GOVERNOR & Attorney General Concerning AHCA &
APD |
| Why
has "APD stripped the rights of people with disabilities to revoke any IRS & Tax authority they claimed from
the participant? If The Agency has created a buisness which they said they would help to support given
the participants an EIN # to be on the waiver; why did they take complete control? Should they not have the right to see all
business transactions? If they were true employers? Why isn't the Participant given the rights of an employer and buisness owner ? APD is not transparent
with any buisness transactions?for example, They could send copies of IRS quarterly transactions pertaining to
vendors and employees in state taxes? Also, records of how the EIN # has been used quarterly, on a regular basis so
that the business owner can confirm all transactions to the state, which would also help the State of Florida Monitor,
any fraud taking place under their personal information. I've asked for years for this information . APD has ignored our request
as representative of tthe partisipant. The participants
only have one choice and thats the choice APD puts in front of them. If they are not accepted by the the participant consequences
are of denial of services ,hearing or being cut off is the result. | Governor
Scott, Would you run a business with out knowing vital information about the business? | | Read More (More Coming) | | Why has "APD" been given privileges to challenge a participant
for the same service multiple times in one year forcing them to have to appeal when "NO" change has occurred in
the medical status and if it did change the status was worse not better ? For Example Read More | AHCA & APD Responsibilities According
to The CMS Technical Guide |  | Governor Rick Scott has been informed | UPDATES: The Fraud brought to
his attention is under investigation. | " NO"
Updates From The Governors Office Yet - Posted Date Dec. 21, 2012 | Reminders of Questions | "APD",
(Attorney) Terin Baras Cremer answers
Petitioners "Interlock Discovery to
the Petitioner", which was approved to be part of discovery by the Hearing
officer, However ,it was then ignored and not even displayed as being part of the discovery or the case. The Discoveryprovided Dates, Amounts
paid out to Services, to the Petitioner (Participant) , under a Participants name. The participant received
only partial services and partial funding and a large portion of funding is kept from AHCA records. Cost plans do no reflect
the correct amount of funds actually spent by the participant. The amount distributed was in the hundreds of
thousands which was not given to the participant. So, What happened to the funding not given to the Participant
(Petitioner), After the Hearing. Why did DCF Hearing Officer ignore the "Interlock Discovery
" and it's existence which caused over $20,000. 00 cut to the participant, when his health stayed constant
recorded on the "APD Discovery Emergency Packet". Motion entered by the petitioner challenged the
amount, frequency and scope change. "APD" and the DCF Hearing officer totally
ignored the motion leaving the "participant" (The person with the Disability)
no voice in the legal system . | 
| Our Personal Research and
Our 10 year plus Experience under the | Agency for Persons with Disabilities "APD" | | Working
with the Waiver Support Coordinators, Fiscal Agents , Accounting Services, Support Plans, Cost Plans,
Purchase Plans, continuous "APD Attorneys", DCF
Hearing Officers and more. This does not make us experts, However, after viewing "Open Government"
documents make me "Question the intentions of those in-charge". Those Who at one time told us they cared, is
now questionable. |  | Walk
with us through the journey as we display the information. This will explain, Why we feel, as we do. |  | Agency for Persons with Disabilities 10 years Fiscal Agents Plus --> Read More | Updates: Public Information |
| OUR PERSONAL FINDING's, USING OUR RIGHTS TO: "OPEN GOVERNMENT " UNCOVERED
FRAUD Bringing Questions In The Following Areas to APD: | | | Why did "APD" distibute so many Notifications & ignore the Appeals for Hearing
in some cases? They tell authorities and hearing officers it was due to shortages and budget cuts ,
So , Why did the unit cos in some cases t go up and so did the QH's? yet we did not see it in the budget reflecting
the services. | | | "APD " Accounting Department enters unknown providers into
entries in our summaries and in our cost plans. Purchase
plan updates are requested with out Hearing or appeal option attached. Why? | | | Names and Dates are coming
as events took place research in process and data being entered. Below are years of information being
added. Read More |  | | |  | |  | | Why
son many being made by APD? | | CDC Plus Fiscal
Agents | | |  | | IRS Reports | | Support Plan | |  | | Cost
Plans | | Continuous Changes | | Purchase Plans | | 2004*2005*2006*2007*2008* | | QSI Report | | 2009*2010*2011*2012*2013 | | Services |  |  | |   | | Did "APD" apply "PCA" twice or even
three times in different accounts using the same participant with out his knowledge ? If so who took the funding? | | Personal Care Assistant "PCA"
(Medicaid) | | Why does age determine the medical need in the state of
Florida? After turning 21the participant was
stripped from Therapies . |  | Personal Care Assistant "PCA" (
DD waiver) | | Hearings  | | Respites | | 8/7/07 case # 4:07 cv 329-RH/WCS | | Therapies OT, PT, SP | | | | Consumable Medical Suply | | 7/01/08 to 6/30/09 | | In Home Support "IHS" | | PSA# 76506 & 17412
Maximus | | Dental | | 1/24/08 (*) 3/21/08 Web-Form | | | |  | | | TIER
CASE FROM 2010 to 2012 | | 7/01/08 to 6/30/09 | | L.T. # 11F-04862 Case#10-2358 | | PSA# 106103
KL |  | (No Attorney)DCA
CASE CASE#ID12-0443 L.T.# 12-0443 SAME ISSUE FROM 2010 |  | 7/01/08 to 6/30/09
PSA# 135147
(RM*) KS
DN 10/17/07 |  | L.T # 12F-10243 .Case # 12-402 |  | APD" challenged
concluded does not meet approval, Medically Necessity Review AP
S but then final order (Approved) 1/21/2009 |  | L.T. # 12F-01244 Case# 11-474
|  | 7/01/08 to 6/30/09
also(Approved) 7/1/09 to 6/30/10 |  | L.T # 12F-10243 Case # 12-1227 | | PSA# 202985 | | L.T. #12F- 02551 Case # 12-0416 | | DN 3/8/11, 4/26/11,
4/27/11 | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | PSA # 120201 2/3/12 | | | | |  |
 |  | | |
| | | ^ More Coming !!!! ^ | | More
Questions for the Governor About "APD" : | | | Does, The Agency for Persons with Disabilities "Really
Care" about the"Participants"? I Now Question the motives of APD. Was this all
meant to be or did greed just get the best of them. Taking from the most vulnerable. Those who know they did should
be a shamed of themselves. IN the end God will have the last word. |  | Is Legislation getting the true numbers "APD"
is spending ? |  | Are Participants
getting the services on the Cost plans and in their budgets, If NOT, Who is? | | Why was the "Respite Pool, FORCED ON" the Participants? Participants were forced to change Purchase
plans by a certain date. How can Hearing take place if they forcibly told Participants to change the amount of their
Budget or else their employees wont be paid by a certain date ? How are Hearings even possible ? It change
the amount and the scope and frequency of what ever they were paying for with the funding. to top it off they were forced
to spend it with in 3 months or it would be taken. Their is no choice in that nor could they save it for the end of the
year if a person was saving the funding for the end of the year Respite time. The Waiver Technical Guide in which The AHCA - APD agreed to follow and abide by the federal Law was ignored : |  | Why do some cost
plans show (19 services Approved) on one participant, when they are (only receiving 3 or 4 services)? |  | When allocations are spent are they reported under the participant
name who never received it? if not, | | What happens to the approved allocated
dollars whom "APD" refuse to give the participant after putting them through a hearing? | | | What happens to the allocation taken from the others(Participants) ? | | Why does "APD
" Produce A budget It does Not Honor? | | Why were the same services
challenged to be reduced every year more than once, when the health was either constant or got worse? | | | Why and How does APD Cover a 26 hour
Day in daily in home Support? | | | -->
When 1st Districts Courts made valid decisions against this practice. | | Why does the participant
who were covered by Medicaid for OT,PT,SP for year have to choose between Personal Care Assistance and OT,PT,SP after
turning 21 under APD ?Services approved and recommended by their Primary Physician, Orthopedic and Therapist. | | | Why are people with disabilities in Appeals cases treated like criminals or simply ignored
? They are sick in body then forced to learn or have their Representatives educate themselves to go against educated Attorneys
who only care about winning a case. Not whether the Participant will die or get worse do ignoring the actual medical letters
by taking the word of a APD or Past Employees "Not Physician" Desk Review. | | Why are criminals given
an attorney, after a crime has been committed? However, when a person with disability files an appeal and needs an attorney,
they make the most vulnerable fend for themselves, knowing the person cannot stand up to an educated attorney. | | How does a part
time Physical Therapist Consultant and Nurses that only show up for hearing, who have never met or examined the participant
, A non licenced employees , Physician , Orthopedics and Therapist override an actual Physician , Orthopedics and Therapist
who has examined and treated the participant for years ? | | Why is "APD allowed
to enter false information in hearing about participants ? and Why are Hearing officer allooud to use false information
and ignore Physicians medically needed documents override by Nurses who have never met the patient and desk reviews that have
no medical degrees make medical decisions with out a license? and Whydid the hearing officer accept
the false information entered by "APD" the recommended that "APD" dismissed the case completely,
totally knocking out the participant.The Hearing officer knew the participant was having a difficult time getting
a probono attorney. The Hearing officer completely ignored facts, approvals, entered and ignored all cost plans
support plans . In the end looking at the way the Agency Hearing Officers work I question what rights do people with disabilities
have ? Everything the Participant entered was completely ignored.. | | Why does "APD"
still violate the law by ignoring what Judges have told them was not fair nor legally right? Does "APD" really care
about the person with the disability? or is it just about winning a case? Have they lost the compassion for the participant,
making it a win or loose game with people 's lives? | | Why
does "APD", request QSI , Support Plan, Cost Plan and Purchase plan. These three are accompanied
by Primary Physician, Special Physicians and Therapies . Which provide . Prescriptions and Medical Needed Letters, then
ignore them and override the information given professionals with a non licensed person whom in the end makes a final
medical decision without ever seeing the participant? | | | Why are medical decision made by Primary Physicians , Orthopedics and Therapist overridden by a non
licensed personnel from APD and AHCA called a desk review? | | | Why did "APD "except or even permit
Support Coordinators to enter 4 Social Security numbers and 6 Medicaid numbers in documents through a period of ten years
? Attorney Generals has the evidence. | | | Why did "APD" allow the account department to send out IRS documents under a business
Called "Hopes Place LLC" an unknown provider to the Participant. EIN # 26-1595034? | | | How in Hopes Place LLC connected to "APD"? | | | It
seems all the RED TAPE "APD" administration cried out to Legislation
to eliminate , which Legislation they approve with some grace, was slammed onto the most Vulnerable Clients with no mercy.
"APD has no Mercy or Grace in the state of Florida when looking at medical reports of the client. or do they
look at them at all? Attorneys are the solutions for "APD" not fixing the problem which produces a balance
and saves money. If they had any they would look for solutions other that forcing the Most Vulnerable to keep by
having to appeal and fight for services needed in non fair hearing which Agencies defend Agencies giving the people no chance. | | |  | | | DARE TO
ASK A MOM WHO WILL NOT HOLD BACK! | | | Have An Awesome and Blessed Day! | | | Thank You For Being Part Of Our Family Especially When We Faced The Hardest Times In Our
Lives | Our
Experiences Have not Been Easy But The Lessons Have Been Miraculous | Bobby's World is a resources page. We pray it
makes your journey smoother for your loved ones.This is our way of making a difference in our community. Bobby's World was
created for personal use, educational, resources and research. | Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction |
|
| |
|
|
|
| | Educational
issues coming | | Florida House Representatives |  | | Hearings | | Petitioners Motion Challenging
| | Scope, Amount and Frequency | Participants Medical condition stays constant . Medical needs are the same, therapies are the same However the
participant turns 21 and "APD" takes away personal Care Assistance,therapies
and denies them services they have been recieving for years. Is that not Age discrimination ?
| | Hearing Officer
| | Ignored Discovery. | | | Where is Medical justification of the removal of funding for services . | | Medical Need had nothing to do with the change of funding so why all the medical policies? | Did filing a complaint of
fraud against "APD" cause the eyes of an Agency Hearing officer to turn away? | | Or, is this a coincidence? |  | I once loved what "APD" stood
for and fought for them but some where along the years "APD" lost their "HEART" for the people
or Now I wonder if "APD" ever had one. After
reviewing the open Government documents I found
out, many were "Not" looking out for our best interest. Many, in the department got greedy and used the participants
situation for their own gain. |  | | What happened to meeting the needs of
the participants with disabilities? |  | | Note: | | Gather the amount paid out to all attorneys . | | Gather the amount paid for the continue restructure of the program. | | Gather the amount of time placed into the continuous challenges against
the people. | Compare
them with the actual cost of what was paid out to the people and after after removing all the fraud. | In my opinion it never gets to the people, The funding stops mid way. The
sad part is the people with disabilities get blamed for it. | | Attorney cost + | | Restructure Cost+ | | Medicaid Fraud / Waiver + | | Waiver Support Coordinator Cost Fraud + | | =____________ | | Minus
( -- ) | | The
actual cost of true services. You will see where all the funding went that was suppose to be helping the disabled population. | | What is sad, more than large % cannot speak for themselves due
to their disabilities, so it was a cruel and cold hearted person, that did this on purpose. |  | | Now "APD"
is all about winning a case. It does not care about the person whom it is suppose to serve as it was set up, as it was
meant in the beginning of the original program. "APD"has left an ever lasting scar in the people's heart. | | | |
 |
| | |
| |  | | | | Advocate Mom /Representative | | | | | | | | | | | | Personal Thoughts | RESOURCES FOUND DURING RESEARCHING
FOR | Robert
Cook | (BOBBY'S) CASES | Questions | To Ask And Think about | | | FOR
PARTICIPANTS IN | | | AHCA
& APD Services | Laws & Cases | Cases Won by Participant | Resources to Law found while Researching. | Centers
for Medicaid/Medicare Services CMS | POWERFUL WEB RESOURCES | eHow | Bad Practices | "APD & AHCA " | Continue to do | EVEN AFTER COURT REVEALED PRACTICES
ARE UNFAIR TO THE PARTICIPANT | "APD"
Cases Lost Read More | | "APD"
Misinterprested the State Law. Read More | "NO, Fair Hearing's" Especially, If the Participant has "NO
ATTORNEY" | | | | Desk Reviews "Non- licensed Administration
Employees Making Medical Decisions or ignoring, medical condition all together placing the Participant in harms way. |  | Just started archives | Archives | | | 12/20/2012 | | | | | | | | Please forgive the multiple copies many drafts are kept due to my continuous learning in writing. I am not a professional
writer, I am an advocate being a voice the voiceless even if it means embarrassing errors. I am doing the best, I know
how. |
| |
|
| | |
| | 
| Agency for Persons with Disabilities"APD" | Chooses "NOT"to Change
Practices Even After They Loose Cases. Why? | 
| Community
Questions for the GOVERNOR & Attorney General Concerning AHCA &
APD |
| Why
has "APD stripped the rights of people with disabilities to revoke any IRS & Tax authority they have?
If The Agency has created a buisness and given the participants an EIN # to be on the waiver, should they not have the
right to see all business transactions? Why isn't the Participant a part of what is happening in the business end
of the documents? such as, receiving IRS copies of transactions with vendors and employees? Also, records of how the EIN #
has been used quarterly, on a regular basis so that the business owner can confirm all transactions to the state, which
would also help the State of Florida Monitor, any fraud taking place under their personal information. | Governor Scott, Would you run a business with out knowing vital information about the business?
| | Read More (More Coming) | | Why has "APD" been given privileges to challenge a participant
for the same service multiple times in one year forcing them to have to appeal when "NO" change has occurred in
the medical status and if it did change the status was worse not better ? For Example Read More | AHCA & APD Responsibilities According
to The CMS Technical Guide |  | Governor Rick Scott has been informed | UPDATES: The Fraud brought to
his attention is under investigation. | " NO"
Updates From The Governors Office Yet - Posted Date Dec. 21, 2012 | Reminders of Questions | "APD",
(Attorney) Terin Baras Cremer answers
Petitioners "Interlock Discovery to
the Petitioner", which was approved to be part of discovery by the Hearing
officer, However ,it was then ignored and not even displayed as being part of the discovery or the case. The Discoveryprovided Dates, Amounts
paid out to Services, to the Petitioner (Participant) , under a Participants name. The participant received
only partial services and partial funding and a large portion of funding is kept from AHCA records. Cost plans do no reflect
the correct amount of funds actually spent by the participant. The amount distributed was in the hundreds of
thousands which was not given to the participant. So, What happened to the funding not given to the Participant
(Petitioner), After the Hearing. Why did DCF Hearing Officer ignore the "Interlock Discovery
" and it's existence which caused over $20,000. 00 cut to the participant, when his health stayed constant
recorded on the "APD Discovery Emergency Packet". Motion entered by the petitioner challenged the
amount, frequency and scope change. "APD" and the DCF Hearing officer totally
ignored the motion leaving the "participant" (The person with the Disability)
no voice in the legal system . | 
| Our Personal Research and
Our 10 year plus Experience under the | Agency for Persons with Disabilities "APD" | | Working
with the Waiver Support Coordinators, Fiscal Agents , Accounting Services, Support Plans, Cost Plans,
Purchase Plans, continuous "APD Attorneys", DCF
Hearing Officers and more. This does not make us experts, However, after viewing "Open Government"
documents make me "Question the intentions of those in-charge". Those Who at one time told us they cared, is
now questionable. |  | Walk
with us through the journey as we display the information. This will explain, Why we feel, as we do. |  | Agency for Persons with Disabilities 10 years Fiscal Agents Plus --> Read More | Updates: Public Information |
| OUR PERSONAL FINDING's, USING OUR RIGHTS TO: "OPEN GOVERMENT " UNCOVERED
FRAUD Bringing Questions In The Following Areas to APD: | | | Why did "APD" distibute so many Notifications & ignore the Appeals for Hearing
in some cases? They tell authrities and hearing officers it was due to shortages and budget cuts ,
So , Why did the unit cos in some cases t go up and so did the QH's? yet we did not see it in the budget reflecting
the services. | | | "APD " Accounting Department enters unknown providers into
entries in our summaries and in our cost plans. Purchase
plan updates are requested with out Hearing or appeal option attached. Why? | | | Names and Dates are coming
as events took place research in process and data being entered. Below are years of information being
added. Read More |  |  |  | | |
| | | ^ More Coming !!!! ^ | | More
Questions for the Governor About "APD" : | | | Does, The Agency for Persons with Disabilities "Really Care"
about the "Participants"? |  | Is Legislation getting the true numbers "APD"
is spending ? |  | Are Participants
getting the services on the Cost plans and in their budgets, If NOT, Who is? | | Why was the "Respite Pool, FORCED ON" the Participants? Participants were forced to change Purchase
plans by a certain date. How can Hearing take place if they forcibly told Participants to change the amount of their
Budget or else their employees wont be paid by a certain date ? How are Hearings even possible ? It change
the amount and the scope and frequency of what ever they were paying for with the funding. to top it off they were forced
to spend it with in 3 months or it would be taken. Their is no choice in that nor could they save it for the end of the
year if a person was saving the funding for the end of the year Respite time. The Waiver Technical Guide in which The AHCA - APD agreed to follow and abide by the federal Law was ignored : |  | Why do some cost
plans show (19 services Approved) on one participant, when they are (only receiving 3 or 4 services)? |  | When allocations are spent are they reported under the participant
name who never received it? if not, | | What happens to the approved allocated
dollars whom "APD" refuse to give the participant after putting them through a hearing? | | | What happens to the allocation taken from the others(Participants) ? | | Why does "APD
" Produce A budget It does Not Honor? | | Why were the same services
challenged to be reduced every year more than once, when the health was either constant or got worse? | | | Why and How does APD Cover a 26 hour
Day in daily in home Support? | | | -->
When 1st Districts Courts made valid decisions against this practice. | | Why does the participant
who were covered by Medicaid for OT,PT,SP for year have to choose between Personal Care Assistance and OT,PT,SP after
turning 21 under APD ?Services approved and recommended by their Primary Physician, Orthopedic and Therapist. | | | Why are people with disabilities in Appeals cases treated like criminals or simply ignored
? They are sick in body then forced to learn or have their Representatives educate themselves to go against educated Attorneys
who only care about winning a case. Not whether the Participant will die or get worse do ignoring the actual medical letters
by taking the word of a APD or Past Employees "Not Physician" Desk Review. | | Why are criminals given
an attorney, after a crime has been committed? However, when a person with disability files an appeal and needs an attorney,
they make the most vulnerable fend for themselves, knowing the person cannot stand up to an educated attorney. | | How does a part
time Physical Therapist Consultant and Nurses that only show up for hearing, who have never met or examined the participant
, A non licenced employees , Physician , Orthopedics and Therapist override an actual Physician , Orthopedics and Therapist
who has examined and treated the participant for years ? | | Why is "APD allowed
to enter false information in hearing about participants ? and Why are Hearing officer allooud to use false information
and ignore Physicians medically needed documents override by Nurses who have never met the patient and desk reviews that have
no medical degrees make medical decisions with out a license? and Whydid the hearing officer accept
the false information entered by "APD" the recommended that "APD" dismissed the case completely,
totally knocking out the participant.The Hearing officer knew the participant was having a difficult time getting
a probono attorney. The Hearing officer completely ignored facts, approvals, entered and ignored all cost plans
support plans . In the end looking at the way the Agency Hearing Officers work I question what rights do people with disabilities
have ? Everything the Participant entered was completely ignored.. | | Why does "APD"
still violate the law by ignoring what Judges have told them was not fair nor legally right? Does "APD" really care
about the person with the disability? or is it just about winning a case? Have they lost the compassion for the participant,
making it a win or loose game with people 's lives? | | Why
does "APD", request QSI , Support Plan, Cost Plan and Purchase plan. These three are accompanied
by Primary Physician, Special Physicians and Therapies . Which provide . Prescriptions and Medical Needed Letters, then
ignore them and override the information given professionals with a non licensed person whom in the end makes a final
medical decision without ever seeing the participant? | | | Why are medical decision made by Primary Physicians , Orthopedics and Therapist overridden by a non
licensed personnel from APD and AHCA called a desk review? | | | Why did "APD "except or even permit
Support Coordinators to enter 4 Social Security numbers and 6 Medicaid numbers in documents through a period of ten years
? Attorney Generals has the evidence. | | | Why did "APD" allow the account department to send out IRS documents under a business
Called "Hopes Place LLC" an unknown provider to the Participant. EIN # 26-1595034? | | | How in Hopes Place LLC connected to "APD"? | | | It
seems all the RED TAPE "APD" administration cried out to Legislation
to eliminate , which Legislation they approve with some grace, was slammed onto the most Vulnerable Clients with no mercy.
"APD has no Mercy or Grace in the state of Florida when looking at medical reports of the client. or do they
look at them at all? Attorneys are the solutions for "APD" not fixing the problem which produces a balance
and saves money. If they had any they would look for solutions other that forcing the Most Vulnerable to keep by
having to appeal and fight for services needed in non fair hearing which Agencies defend Agencies giving the people no chance. | | MORE TO COME!!!! | | |  | | | DARE TO
ASK A MOM WHO WILL NOT HOLD BACK! | | | Have An Awesome and Blessed Day! | | | Thank You For Being Part Of Our Family Especially When We Faced The Hardest Times In Our
Lives | Our
Experiences Have not Been Easy But The Lessons Have Been Miraculous | Bobby's World is a resources page. We pray it
makes your journey smoother for your loved ones.This is our way of making a difference in our community. Bobby's World was
created for personal use, educational, resources and research. | Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction |
|
| |
|
|
|
| | Educational
issues coming | | Florida House Representatives |  | | Hearings | | Petitioners Motion Challenging
| | Scope, Amount and Frequency | Participants Medical condition stays constant . Medical needs are the same, therapies are the same However
he turns 21 and "APD" doesnt Age discrimination comply
here ? | | Hearing
Officer | | Ignored the change | | Where is the justification of the removal of
funding. |  | Did filing a
complaint of fraud cause the eyes of an Agency Hearing officer to turn away? | | Is this a coincidence? |  | | I once loved what "APD" stood for but
some where along the years they lost their "HEART" for the people or did they ever have one. After reviewing the
open Goverment documents, I found out, some one was "Not" looking out for our best interest. Some one, in the department
got greedy and used the participants situation for their own gain. | | | | What happened to the People with disabilities? | | Note: | | Gather the amount paid out to all attorneys . | | Gather the amount paid for the continue restructure of the program. | | Gather the amount of time placed into the continuous challanges against
the people. | Compare
them with the actual cost of what was paid out to the people and after after removing all the fraud. | In my opinion it never gets to the people, The funding stops mid way. The
sad part is then the people with disabilities get blamed for it. | | Attorney cost + | | Restructure Cost+ | | Medicaid Fraud / Waiver + | | Waiver Support Coordinator Cost Fraud + | | =____________ | | Minus
( -- ) | | The
actual cost of true services and you will see where all the funding went that was suppose to be helping the disabled population. | | What is sad more than 50 % cannot speak for themselves due to their disabilities
so it took a cruel and cold heart for those who did this on purpose. | | funding to the (Just) the creation pf the program and its defenders but benefited all the attorney
and not the people with disabilities | | Now "APD" is all about winning a case. It does not care about the person whom it is
suppose to serve as it was set up for in the beggining of the original program. It has left an ever lasting scar in the people's
heart. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
|